Sometimes a trade proposal makes sense on paper, and I still wonder whether a team is solving the right problem.

In this trade proposal, the Detroit Red Wings get Quinn Hughes, a Norris Trophy-winning defenceman who can change a game. Minnesota gets Simon Edvinsson, Nate Danielson and a first-round pick. The Minnesota Wild also send Yakov Trenin to Detroit.

I can see the logic. Detroit gets an established star, while Minnesota gets young talent and future flexibility. But I think there’s something more interesting happening here than deciding who wins the deal.

What If the Red Wings Are Trying to Solve the Wrong Problem?

What if Detroit’s problem isn’t Simon Edvinsson’s price tag, but the possibility that a difficult negotiation is changing how the organization sees him? Edvinsson is 23, was drafted sixth overall, and has already shown he can handle substantial NHL minutes. Detroit has spent years developing him. Now, with the two sides reportedly far apart on a contract, he’s not playing.

That’s an uncomfortable place for everyone. From the team’s perspective, there’s a salary cap to manage and a roster to build. They said they have zero interest in trading Edvinsson, but will they be forced to consider it? From the player’s perspective, this may be the moment to establish what he believes he’s worth. Neither side has to be wrong for a negotiation to become a problem.

But here’s the danger. When a player isn’t available, it’s easy to start thinking about what his departure might bring back. A frustrating contract dispute can gradually turn into a discussion about whether the player fits the plan. And suddenly, trading him for somebody else’s established star starts to look like a solution.

In This Trade Proposal, the Return Isn’t Uncomplicated

There’s just one catch: Quinn Hughes comes with his own question. Hughes is an exceptional defenceman, but he’s also approaching unrestricted free agency. Minnesota acquired him at considerable cost, and the Wild now have to decide what they’re willing to pay to keep him. Hughes recently said his “two feet are planted in Minnesota,” while stopping short of promising an extension. Sportsnet reported his latest comments on October 24.

Would Detroit really want to exchange a young defenceman it has developed for a superstar whose long-term future it hasn’t secured? Maybe. Sometimes you have to take a swing to get somewhere in this league.

What Problem Are the Red Wings Really Trying to Solve?

But I keep coming back to a simple thought: the player you have a hard time signing isn’t necessarily the player you should trade for. Detroit needs to decide whether Edvinsson belongs in its future. Minnesota needs to decide how much of its future it wants to commit to Hughes.

Those are two different decisions, even if this proposal makes them look like one convenient transaction.

Related: Dylan Larkin Is Taking the Heat. But What About the Red Wings?