Here’s a hockey argument that never seems to go away. Who was better, Wayne Gretzky or Connor McDavid? And where does Auston Matthews fit when we’re talking about the greatest goal scorers in NHL history?

It’s a good debate. But we need to consider something before we start comparing numbers from different generations.

The NHL Hasn’t Always Been the Same Game.

Back in the 1980s, teams regularly scored more goals than they do today. In some seasons, the league averaged close to four goals per team per game. In recent years, that figure has generally been closer to three. That makes a difference. Scoring 50 goals when the league is producing goals at a higher rate isn’t quite the same statistical achievement as scoring 50 in a tighter defensive environment.

This is where era-adjusted scoring comes in. The idea is fairly simple: adjust a player’s production to account for the scoring environment, schedule length, and other differences between seasons. It gives us a fairer starting point for comparing players who never faced the same conditions.

How Era-Adjusted Scoring Works When Looking at Gretzky, McDavid & Matthews?

Era-adjusted scoring figures are drawn from Hockey-Reference’s standard methodology, which normalizes player production to an 82-game schedule, an 18-skater roster, and a league average of six goals per game. That site has the cleanest and most commonly referenced explanation of how the adjustment works.

Wayne Gretzky’s raw numbers are almost hard to comprehend. He scored 92 goals in 1981-82 and recorded 215 points in 1985-86. Adjusting for the scoring environment brings those totals down, but it doesn’t make Gretzky any less remarkable. His best seasons still stand out because he wasn’t simply collecting points in a high-scoring league. He was dominating his competition.

Connor McDavid presents a different challenge. His best seasons have come in a much more modern NHL, where producing points is generally harder. His raw totals might not match Gretzky’s biggest seasons, but era adjustment helps show just how extraordinary McDavid’s production has been relative to his own time.

That doesn’t automatically make the two players equal. Gretzky’s highest peaks remain a formidable standard. But it does help explain why McDavid belongs in the conversation rather than being judged solely against numbers accumulated four decades ago.

Then there’s Auston Matthews. Matthews is a different kind of player in this discussion because we’re looking specifically at goal scoring. His ability to produce goals at an elite rate in today’s NHL deserves particular attention. When goals are harder to come by, a 60-goal season carries a different kind of weight.

This Is Where Era-Adjusted Comparisons Get Useful.

The chart helps put the differences in scoring environments into perspective. Rather than simply lining up career totals and declaring a winner, we can look at how each player’s production compares once we account for the era.

Even Adjusting for Era Doesn’t Really Settle the Question of Who’s the Best NHL Scorer

Does that settle the debate? Of course not. Era adjustment can’t measure every aspect of a player’s game, and no formula can completely capture the differences between generations. But it can make the argument fairer.

Gretzky’s greatness doesn’t need protecting from modern statistics. McDavid’s greatness shouldn’t be diminished because he plays in a different era. And Matthews deserves credit for what he’s doing in an environment where goals are harder to find.

Sometimes, the numbers don’t tell the whole story until we understand the game behind them. Still, it’s fun to wonder just how good McDavid and Matthews might have been in a different era.

Related: Analyst: Dylan Larkin Should Be Embarrassed By Trade Request Botch